SOS Kerry: Another Village Idiot the USA Doesn’t Want to Claim [Video]

Rice dented Kerry should have gotten “Black Hearts” not Purple Hearts. This moronic SOS is surly not the “original” village idiot, but, he is one of the most treasonous, two faced traitors the USA has ever known and certainly should not have the ability to talk or confer with our enemies.   Enjoy Gov. Huckabee’s candor, we did.

[jwplayer config="PBN" mediaid="122166"]

50 More US Spec Ops Troops Sent to Iraq #MakeDClisten #tcot #ccot #Iraq #ISIS #ISIL #USA

us-special-ops-have-become-much-much-scarier-since-911Pentagon/Washington D.C. -According to reports by Pentagon officials via Fox New’s national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin, fifty more special ops troops known as “advisers” have been sent over to Iraq to guard the American Embassy there. There are now a total of five hundred ‘advisers’ on the ground at present.

~ M. Katherine Orts and husband Pastor David Orts reporting for and founders of USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny With Truth” for the Glory of God and our good. 

#Obama #Bergdahl: #Treason and Treachery from Multiple Fronts

jrosen_160

Investigative reporter and author, James Rosen, spoke on The Mark Levin radio show today with breaking news regarding alleged deserter, US Army Sgt Bowe Bergdahl.

Mr. Rosen has retained access to multiple reports from a reliable intelligence agency. Rosen has personally attained and read at least thirteen reports spanning dates from August 2009 to approximately October 2012. They were provided by a private intel service that the US government uses and other well-known media services uses.

“Running thread about Mullah Sangeen…” ~ Rosen stated the multiple reports contain classified information.

In a Long War Journal’s previous article in October  2013:

Haqqani Network said to name successor to Mullah Sangeen

By all of Sgt. Bowe’s fellow soldier’s accounts. Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl purposefully deserted his own camp five years ago and betrayed his brothers and sisters on the field of war failing to uphold his oath of service in the US Army. There are at least fourteen deaths and multiple casualties with grave injuries of our US Soldiers and our allies said to be associated with the sustained and highly dangerous search of the then missing Sgt. Bergdahl.

bowe-bergdahl

US Army Sgt Bowe Bergdahl – Willing Captive? Or Kidnapped Deserter?

New reports allege that Bowe Bergdahl may have been feigning to be a Mujahideen (a loyalist to the call of Islamic Jihad) in order to

read more

USA, Demand Obama & Kerry Work To #BringBackOurMarine #AndrewTahmooressi [3VIDEOS]

andrew.USMarineSgt.Mexico.05.2014

Jill Tahmooressi, the mother of US Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi, has been trying to help her son get due process through US officials and through the Mexican government’s legal system since the day he was arrested by the Mexican Army for inadvertently driving into Mexico with his US legally registered guns. Sgt Tahmooressi simply missed the last sign due to poor signage amidst ongoing construction on the US side of the Mexican border.

Upon accidentally missing his exit, Andrew realized his error immediately and had called 911 to let the US authorities know of his plight. The Mexican Army immediately arrested Andrew and would not let the Border Patrol let him go even though Andrew had volunteered to show the entire contents of his truck in which contained all of his possessions including his legally owned guns.

A man of Christian faith, Andrew says that he is trusting in God to help him get through this and deliver him out of his situation.

[jwplayer config="PBN" mediaid="114692"]

At the onset of an interview, Andrew’s mom was caught off guard and suddenly brought to tears the first moments of speaking with Greta Van Susteren on her Fox news show On The Record with Greta. Mrs.Tahmooressi hadn’t yet heard or viewed her son’s Mexican jail house interview. Jill Tahmooressi has been the voice of her son demanding attention be paid to help her son get due process in a country that is supposed to be our ally.

When Greta asked Jill what the US Secretary of State (John Kerry) was doing. Jill replied that nothing absolutely nothing is being done and that they are all at a standstill.  Allegedly John Kerry spoke with someone in authority at the Mexican prison on the phone Wednesday on Andrew’s behalf. We will wait and see. America, we must demand SOS John Kerry resign immediately if there is no meaningful productive action being taken in defense of Andrew.

Here’s Greta’s behind the scenes detailed experience in Mexico waiting to interview Andrew which never transpired yet the guards let in a huge transport truck without ever checking its contents in the trailer. Outrageous! Must watch!

[jwplayer config="PBN" mediaid="114711"]

In 2012 the United States had given Mexico $316.7 million dollars  (Three Hundred Sixteen Million And Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ) in aid from US taxpayers and Obama’s administration continued to promote additional US Food Stamps to Mexican and other illegal immigrants that routinely find their way across our US borders.

read more

We Remember You, #MemorialDay, Every Day [VIDEO]

Dear Patriots,

We want to take a moment to speak about Memorial Day which is more than the holiday heralding summer. It is a time when our nation reflects with gratitude on the sacrifice so many in uniform have made for our freedoms, and for our liberties as a still unique, and still free nation of the people by the people and for the people.

May you have a safe, reflective day in remembrance of those fallen.

All gave some, some gave all.

God bless, protect and encourage you and yours, this and every day.

Is the U.S. ARMY Unamerican? Saying Don’t Read, Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Etc

The government’s war on the rights of conservatives isn’t  just being waged by the IRS; the U.S. Army apparently is also participating. According to this report from Fox News, Master Sgt. Nathan Sommers, a 25-year Army veteran and conservative Christian based at Fort Myer in the Washington, D.C. area, has been harassed and persecuted for expressing conservative views and for reading books by Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and David Limbaugh. read more

UNCLASSIFIED Crucial Information: Mass Shootings Analysis – Commonalities and Trends

Biden_Shotgun
USA, the guns that were used in these past US mass shooting atrocities were not automatic military style weapons. Some were semi automatic and some were handguns and shotguns. And while we are on the topic the word “assault weapon” can be used in place of ANY weapon for that is what weapons are meant to do, either defend the assault or prevent by offensive measures an impending assault. The Obama Administration’s support of Senator Feinstein’s Gun Ban is not meant to prevent future atrocities instead its ultimate goal is to control the masses and general law abiding populace in order to rule by “fiat” more readily -PBN

NJROIC-Mass Shootings .PDF

INFORMATION NOTICE: This product contains unclassified information that is for official use only ( U//FOUO ).

US Feds Prepping For Civil Unrest

http://oda141teamroom.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/civilunrest.jpg

Imagine the worst-case scenario if the sequester goes through. The market nosedives. The economy implodes. Empty shelves. Riots. The feds hit the streets in force to restore order in a “national emergency.”

Sounds like something in a Third World country or Greece. It could never happen here, right? Think again, says Sarah Palin.

The former Alaska governor and Republican vice-presidential nominee believes the federal government is “stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”

Palin says the feds are afraid of what might happen if the sequester goes into effect.

She writes on her Facebook page: “If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished. We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”

The sequester will trigger $85 billion in immediate cuts to federal funding and $1.2 trillion over 10 years unless lawmakers reach a deal by Friday.

The prospect of civil unrest puts a chilling spin on an off-teleprompter remark then-candidate Barack Obama made in a Colorado campaign speech in July, 2008.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” said candidate Obama.

Palin’s warning echoes a WND report Feb. 17 citing radio host Mark Levin’s point that federal non-military agencies have purchased enough ammunition recently not only to shoot every American five times but also engage in a prolonged, domestic war.

Why do federal agencies need all that ammunition?

The government’s official explanation for the massive ammo buy is that law enforcement agents in the respective agencies need the bullets for “mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.”

The staggering number and lack of details in the official explanation, however, has led to rampant speculation, including concerns DHS is arming itself to fight off insurrection by Americans.

“To provide some perspective,” Levin noted, “experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, the [DHS] is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war. A 24-year Iraq war!

“I’m going to tell you what I think is going on,” Levin offered. “I don’t think domestic insurrection. Law enforcement and national security agencies, they play out multiple scenarios. I’ll tell you what I think they’re simulating: the collapse of our financial system, the collapse of our society and the potential for widespread violence, looting, killing in the streets, because that’s what happens when an economy collapses.

“I suspect that just in case our fiscal situation, our monetary situation, collapses, and following it the civil society collapses, that is the rule of law, they want to be prepared,” Levin said. “I know why the government’s arming up: It’s not because there’s going to be an insurrection; it’s because our society is unraveling.”

As WND reported last August, news that the Social Security Administration was set to purchase 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets for 41 locations across the country followed word of major ammo buys by the DHS and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

A solicitation posted by the SSA on the FedBizOpps website asked for contractors to supply 174,000 rounds of .357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow-point pistol ammunition.

An online ammunition retailer described the bullets as suitable “for peak performance rivaling and sometimes surpassing handloads in many guns,” noting that the ammo is “a great personal defense bullet.”

WND has been at the forefront of reporting growing federal police power across dozens of government agencies for more than a decade and a half.

  • In 1997, WND blew the lid off 60,000 federal agents enforcing over 3,000 criminal laws, a report that prompted Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America to remark, “Good grief, that’s a standing army. … It’s outrageous.”
  • Also in 1997, as part of a ongoing series on the militarization of the federal government, WND reported on the armed, “environment crime” cops employed by the Environmental Protection Agency and a federal law enforcement program that had trained 325,000 prospective federal police since 1970.
  • WND also reported on thousands of armed officers in the Inspectors’ General office and a gun-drawn raid on a local flood control center to haul off 40 boxes of … paperwork.
  • WND further reported on a plan by then Delaware Sen. Joe Biden to hire hundreds of armed Hong Kong policemen into dozens of U.S. federal agencies to counter Asian organized crime in America.
  • In 1999, WND CEO Joseph Farah warned there were more than 80,000 armed federal law enforcement agents, constituting “the virtual standing army over which the founding fathers had
    nightmares.” Today, that number has nearly doubled.
  • Also in 1999 WND reported plans made for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, to use military and police forces to deal with Y2K.
  • In 2000, Farah discussed a Justice Department report on the growth of federal police agents under President Clinton, something Farah labeled “the biggest arms buildup in the history of the
    federal government – and it’s not taking place in the Defense Department.”
  • A 2001 report warned of a persistent campaign by the Department of the Interior, this time following 9/11, to gain police powers for its agents.
  • In 2008, WND reported on proposed rules to expand the military’s use inside U.S. borders to prevent “environmental damage” or respond to “special events” and to establish policies for “military support for civilian law enforcement.”
  • Most recently, WND reported that while local police have found themselves short of necessary ammunition, the federal government has been stockpiling billions of rounds for its non-military, non-FBI law enforcement officers.

Recently, other media outlets have begun to take notice of the alarming trend.

Andrew Malcolm wrote Feb. 8 for Investors.com: “In a puzzling, unexplained development, the Obama administration has been buying and storing vast amounts of ammunition in recent months, with the Department of Homeland Security just placing another order for an additional 21.6 million rounds.

“Several other agencies of the federal government also began buying large quantities of bullets last year. The Social Security Administration, for instance, not normally considered on the frontlines of anything but dealing with seniors, explained that its purchase of millions of rounds was for special agents’ required quarterly weapons qualifications. They must be pretty poor shots.”

Another recent report questions the motives of the DHS.

On Jan. 4, Ryan Keller wrote at Examiner.com: “DHS has stockpiled nearly 2 billion rounds of ammo. This is an unusually large amount for a federal agency to be stockpiling. The agency has refused to give an explanation for these purchases, going so far as to black out information on another solicitation, which is illegal without Congressional authorization or in response to national security issues.

“The typical response from the media has been that the rounds are for target practice; however, hollow points are not used for target shooting. Hollow points are too expensive and not designed for target practice; instead, full metal jacket rounds are used for training.”

By Garth Kant

Source Here:

Feds Buying Enough Bullets for ’24-year war’ Against US Citizens

dhs_bulletsFederal, non-military agencies, noted radio host Mark Levin last week, have purchased enough ammunition recently to not only shoot every American five times, but also engage in a prolonged, domestic war.

The numbers are based on recent reports that put the total federal ammunition buy in the last 10 months at approaching two billion rounds.

“To provide some perspective,” Levin noted, “experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, the [Department of Homeland Security] is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war. A 24-year Iraq war!”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/feds-buying-enough-bullets-for-24-year-war/#2e0hQRvfJfXZwBX7.99

Fort Hood Victims ‘BETRAYED’ by Obama [NEW VIDEO]

Obama has a knack for betraying those closest to him. But when dissenters or military are in his path, he will do all he can to destroy them. Truly, the only way to be on a the side of those against the USA is to take a stance against the USA. Obama and his cabinet are an enemy within our country, they are practicing taqiyya and the only way to rid ourselves of these parasites is by sharing the truth and doing your part at every opportunity.

The heroine police sergeant who helped stop the Fort Hood killing spree and went on to sit with the First Lady at President Obama’s State of the Union speech three years ago has been laid off and says she and other victims of the shootings have been “betrayed” by the commander-in-chief.

“Betrayed is a good word,” former Sgt. Kimberly Munley told ABC News in an interview Tuesday. “Not to the least little bit have the victims been taken care of. In fact, they’ve been neglected.”

Maj. Nidal Hasan is accused of the November 2009 spree, which left 13 dead and 32 shot at the military base in Texas. Munley was shot three times as she and her partner confronted Hasan. Prosecutors say Hasan was a disgruntled Army psychiatrist and Muslim who had become radicalized through communications with Al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

Hasan is awaiting a military trial on murder charges.

Munley said she has been laid off from her position on Fort Hood’s civilian police force.

The White House and Pentagon have refused to characterize the attack as terrorism, instead terming it “workplace violence.” The victims have been denied Purple Hearts and are suing the military because they claim the “workplace violence” designation gives them diminished access to medical care and financial benefits normally available to those whose wounds are designated as “combat related.”

An Army spokesman told ABC none of the military victims have been neglected and that it has no oversight of Veterans Administration policies.

Munley told the network the White House used her for political advantage by having her sit next to Michelle Obama during the president’s 2010 State of the Union address.

READ the Fort Hood Victims’ Lawsuit

Some of the victims “had to find civilian doctors to get proper medical treatment” and the military has not assigned liaison officers to help them coordinate their recovery, said the group’s lawyer, Reed Rubinstein.

“There’s a substantial number of very serious, crippling cases of post-traumatic stress disorder exacerbated, frankly, by what the Army and the Defense Department did in this case,” said Rubinstein. “We have a couple of cases in which the soldiers’ command accused the soldiers of malingering, and would say things to them that Fort Hood really wasn’t so bad, it wasn’t combat.”

Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said the Department of Defense is “committed to the highest care of those in our military family.”

“Survivors of the incident at Fort Hood are eligible for the same medical benefits as all servicemembers,” said Little. “The Department of Defense is also committed to the integrity of the ongoing court martial proceedings of Major Nidal Hasan and for that reason will not at this time further characterize the incident.”

Secretary of the Army John McHugh told ABC News he was unaware of any specific complaints from the Fort Hood victims, even though he is a named defendant in the lawsuit filed last November which specifically details the plight of many of them.

“If a soldier feels ignored, then we need to know about it on a case by case basis,” McHugh told ABC News. “It is not our intent to have two levels of care for people who are wounded by whatever means in uniform.”

Some of the victims in the lawsuit believe the Army Secretary and others are purposely ignoring their cases out of political correctness.

Despite extensive evidence that Hasan was in communication with al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki prior to the attack, the military has denied the victims a Purple Heart and is treating the incident as “workplace violence” instead of “combat related” or terrorism.

READ a Federal Report on the FBI’s Probe of Hasan’s Ties to al-Awlaki

Al-Awlaki has since been killed in a U.S. drone attack in Yemen, in what was termed a major victory in the U.S. efforts against al Qaeda.

Munley and dozens of other victims have now filed a lawsuit against the military alleging the “workplace violence” designation means the Fort Hood victims are receiving lower priority access to medical care as veterans, and a loss of financial benefits available to those who injuries are classified as “combat related.”

Sources here

Impeaching Obama Gains Steam

impeach.obama.mko.

Let the president be duly warned. Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

120213obama2

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

“This week it was Secretary of Defense Panetta’s declaration before the Senate Armed Services Committee that he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations,” Tancredo writes. “This led to Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., introducing an official resolution calling for impeachment should Obama take offensive action based on Panetta’s policy statement, because it would violate the Constitution.”

In response to questions from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., over who determines the proper and legal use of the U.S. military, Panetta said, “Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would … come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress – I think those are issues we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here.”“Well, I’m almost breathless about that,” Sessions responded, “because what I heard you say is, ‘We’re going to seek international approval, and then we’ll come and tell the Congress what we might do, and we might seek congressional approval.’ And I just want to say to you that’s a big [deal].”

Asked again what was the legal basis for U.S. military force, Panetta suggested a NATO coalition or U.N. resolution.

Sessions was dumbfounded by the answer.

“Well, I’m all for having international support, but I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “They can provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”

The exchange itself can be seen below:

The full wording of H. Con. Res. 107, which is currently referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, is as follows:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under Article I, Section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

by DREW ZAHN

Source & Complete Article Here.

Dirty Liar Harry Reid Lies About $2.6 trillion cuts in ‘This Week’ interview [VIDEO]

http://campaigntrailreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/dirty.jpgSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) answers a reporters questions after the Democrat’s weekly policy luncheon, at the US Capitol, January 29, 2013, in Washington, DC. The leaders discussed pending immigration reform, bipartisan issues and the recent Supreme Court ruling on President Obama’s recess appointments. UPI/Mike Theiler
Even the liberal leaning FactCheck.org called out Senator Harry Reid for being doubly wrong in his claim that Congress has already cut $2.6 trillion from projected future deficits by reducing non-defense programs alone.

The site explained that not only did the legislation he referred to applied to both security and non-security spending, but that a considerable part of the deficit reduction came from tax increases and not spending cuts.

The worst part? The senator made the same erroneous statement twice. Reid made the affirmations on ABC’s “This Week” on Feb. 3rd, were he also added that further deficit reduction should include more tax increases and cuts in military spending.

“The American people need to understand that it’s not as if we’ve done nothing for the debt. $2.6 trillion, $2.6 trillion already we’ve made in cuts. And all those cuts have come from non-defense programs. We need to keep our eye on the prize and continue doing something about spending, but I think that what we need to do is do some of the things that Mitt Romney talked about. He said there’s some low-hanging fruit; there are a lot of tax loopholes that should be closed. I agree with him. We haven’t done that.,” he said.

Later on, after host George Stephanopoulos probed the Senator on the issue, he repeated his claim saying,

“I repeat: $2.6 trillion already, all coming from non-defense. If we’re going to have a sequester, defense is going to have to do their share”

According to FactCheck.org Reid inflated the $2.6 trillion figure for the show. The senator referred to the same figure as being $100 billion less, three days before on the Senate Floor.

“We have already made nearly $2.5 trillion in historic, bipartisan deficit reduction,” he said on the floor Jan. 31.