95 Year Old Female #TuskegeeAirman #AmeliaJones #AfricanAmerican Receives Congressional Gold Medal

95-year-old Tuskegee Air(wo)man awarded Congressional Gold Medal

Army Air Corps Sgt. Amelia Jones, a veteran of the original Tuskegee Airman, addresses the audience after receiving the Congressional Gold Medal at Hospice Savannah in Savannah, Ga., April 19, 2015. Army Brig. Gen. James R. Blackburn Jr., right, helped present the medal to her. U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Richard Wrigley

04/21/2015

Tuskegee Airman Receives Congressional Gold Medal

U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia speaks before presenting the Congressional Gold Medal to Army Air Corps Sgt. Amelia Jones, a 95-year-old veteran of the original Tuskegee Airmen, at Hospice Savannah in Savannah, Ga., April 19, 2015. read more

Clinton Allegedly CoveredUp Obama’s Fake Family Hushed Queen of England’s Archive Chief [2VIDEOS]

Clinton.w.Queen+Hosts+Reception+Deligates+London+Summit.
Hillary Clinton was sent, it is believed, under great emotional trauma and possible duress, allegedly on behalf of the President Barack Obama the 44th President in the White House, on a covert purposed mission to England in August 2009 prior to also traveling to the subsequent and very out of the way jaunt to Kenya, Africa for two weeks that same August 2009.

Hillary’s travel history reveals she was indeed in Kenya, Africa in August 4th through August 7th, 2009 officially meeting with the Somalian President, Shiekh Ahmed, but her published travel history omits the surprise visit to England to meet with the Queen of England’s Chief of Archives.

Hillary.Travel.History

read more

US Congress: Treason In Time of War Shall Be Punishable By Death #tcot


By Section 110 of Article III. of the Constitution of the United States, it is declared that:

“Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason.”

In 1790, the Congress of the United States enacted that:

“If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars.”

JAMES MADISON in the 43d number of the Federalist says:

“As treason may be committed against the United States the authority of the United States ought to be enabled to punish it: but as new tangled and artificial treasons have been the great engines by which violent factions, the natural offspring of free governments, have usually wreaked their alternate malignity on each other, the Convention has with great judgment opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger by inserting a Constitutional definition of the crime.”

The Constitution confines the crime of treason to two species; First, the levying of war against the United States; and Secondly, adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. In so doing the very words of the Statute of Treason of EDWARD the THIRD were adopted; and thus the framers of the Constitution recognized the well settled interpretation of these phrases in the administration of criminal law which has prevailed for centuries in England.

Treason, according to Lord COKK, is derived from trahir, signifying to betray; and trahison, by contraction, treason, is the betraying itself.

In England, high treason can only be committed against the KING, for the oath of allegiance is to the KING alone, as the only supreme Governor — he has no partners in the supremacy.

Hitherto, but few cases have occurred in the United States in which it has been necessary for the Federal Courts to act upon this important subject. In 1807 ERICK BALLMAN and SAMUEL SWARTWONT were committed to prison in the District of Columbia, on a charge of high treason against the United States. The prisoners were brought by a writ of habeas corpus before the Supreme Court of the United States. In delivering the opinion of the Court, Chief-Justice MARSHALL said:

“To constitute that specific crime for which the prisoners now before the Court have been commuted, war must be actually levied against the United States. However flagitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the Government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war. and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into operation by an assemblage of men for a purpose, treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed.” * * * * * * * “It is not the intention of the Court to say that no individual can be guilty of this crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men Be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men for a treasonable purpose to constitute levying of war. Crimes, so atrocious as those which have for their object the subversion by violence of those laws and those institutions which have been ordained in order to secure the peace and happiness of society, are not to escape punishment because they have not ripened into treason. The wisdom of the Legislature is competent to provide for the case.”

In the case of The United States vs. FRIES, Mr. Justice CHASE said on the trial, and stated the opinion of the Court to be,

“That if a body of people, conspire and meditate an insurrection to resist or oppose the execution of any statute of the United States by force, they are only guilty of a high misdemeanor; but if they proceed to carry such intention into execution by force, that they are guilty of the treason of levying war; and the quantum of the force employed neither lessens or increases the crime — whether by one hundred or one thousand persons is wholly immaterial;”

* * * “and that it is altogether immaterial whether the force used is sufficient to effectuate the object; any force connected with the intention will constitute the crime of levying war.”

In the case of the United States vs. AARON BURR, Chief-Justice MARSHALL said:

“There is no difficulty in affirming that there must be a war, or the crime of levying it cannot exist; but there would often be considerable difficulty in affirming that a particular act did or did not involve the person committing it in the guilt and in the fact of levying war. If, for example, an army should be actually raised for the avowed purpose of carrying on open war against the United States and subverting their Government, the point must be weighed very deliberately before a Judge would venture to decide that an overt act of levying war had not been committed by a Commissary of purchases who never saw the army, but who, knowing its object, and leaguing himself with the rebels supplied that army with provisions; or by a Recruiting-officer, holding a commission in the rebel service, who, though never in camp, executed the particular duty assigned to him.”

This able jurist, in the same case, states that the term “levying war,” as used in the Constitution of the United States, was unquestionably employed in the same sense in which it was understood in England and in this country, to have been used in the Statute of EDWARD III., from which it was borrowed, and refers to principles laid down by COKE, HALE, FOSTER, BLACKSTONE and HAWKINS.

FOSTER says:

“Attacking the King’s forces, in opposition to his authority, upon a march or in quarters, is levying war.”

And also that

“Holding a castle or fort against the King or his forces, if actual force be used in order to keep possession, is levying war.” — Sec. 4 Cranch Reps. 75, 137, Appendix 470-507.

FOSTER further states, in his valuable Treatise on Treason, that all insurrection, to effect certain innovations of a public and general concern, by an armed force, to be, in construction of law, high treason within the clause of levying war. He farther says:

“An assembly armed and arrayed in a warlike manner for a treasonable purpose is bellum, levatum, though not bellum percussum; listing and marching are sufficient overt acts, without coming to a battle or action. So cruising on the King’s subjects, under a French Commission, France being then at war with us, was held to be adhering to the King’s enemies, though no other act of hostility be proved.” — See 4 Cranch, pp. 478,479:

Lord COKE says: “If many conspire to levy war, and some of them do levy the same, according to the conspiracy this is high treason in all.” “Why? Because all were legally present when the war was levied? No. “For in treason,” continues Lord COKE, “all be principals and war is levied.” This doctrine of Lord COKE has been adopted by all subsequent writers; and it is generally laid down in the English books that whatever will make a man an accessory in felony will make him a principal in treason:

“It is well known,” says FOSTER, ” that in the language of the law there are no accessories in high treason — all are principals. Every instance of incitement, aid, or protection, which in case of felony will render a man an accessory before or after the fact, in the case of high treason, whether it be treason at common law or by statute, will make him a principal in treason.”

“The propriety of investing the National Government.” says Mr. Justice STORY, in his Commentaries on the Constitution, “with authority to punish the crime of treason against the United States, could never become a question with any persons who deem ed the National Government worthy of creation or preservation. If the power had not been expressly granted, it must have been implied, unless all the powers of the National Government might be put at defiance and prostrated with impunity. Two motives probably concurred in introducing it as an express power. One was, not to leave it open to implication whether it was to be exclusively punished with death, according to the known rule of the common law, and with the barbarous accompaniments pointed out by it — but to confide the punishment to the discretion of Congress. The other was, to impose some limitation upon the nature and extent of the punishment, so that it should not work corruption of blood or forfeiture beyond the life of the offender.”

Treason has ever been deemed the highest crime which can be committed in civil society; since its aim is an overthrow of the Government and a public resistance by force of its just powers, its tendency is to create universal danger and alarm, and on this account it has often been visited with the deepest public resentment. Hence, by the common law, the the punishment of high treason was accompanied by all the refinements in cruelty which were oftentimes literally and studiously executed. But under the Constitution of the United States the power of punishing the crime of treason against the United States is exclusive in Congress; and the trial of the offence belongs exclusively to the Federal tribunals. A State cannot take cognizance or punish the offence, whatever it may do in relation to the offence of treason committed exclusively against itself.

Source: Ratification of US Constitution 1790 EXCERPT Article Published January 25, 1861 Public Domain

USA’s PBN Welcomes PM Benjamin “Bibi“ .@Netanyahu “For Such A Time is This…“ #Purim #Fast&Pray #Israel

In the Prime Minister of Israel’s own words…

“I’m going to Washington on a fateful, even historic, mission,” he said as he boarded his plane in Tel Aviv. “I feel that I am an emissary of all Israel’s citizens, even those who do not agree with me, and of the entire Jewish people,” ~Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu  (Reuters)

spoken March 1st, 2015 as Benjamin “Bibi“ Netanyahu was boarding his plane from Israel to the United States in order to give a highly important speech Tuesday morning to our United States Congress.

Bibi’s speech before Congress will air on FoxNews Channel Tuesday morning. Check your local cable network for details

Mr. Netanyahu will be speaking on a topic of historic importance regarding Iran obtaining Nuclear weapons capabilities and Iran’s hostile intent to use those weapons to destroy Israel and even reach The United States of America.  The Obama administration has been aiding and abetting Iran and other Islamic nations and entities such as IS by not even speaking of the existence of radical Islam, Islamic Jihad or Iran and other Islamic nations to establish a one world order global Islamic Caliphate at the behest and approval of all 57 Islamic States who are members of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) not loosely, affiliated with the UN (United Nations).

For the very first time in the history of our two nation’s allegiance, The President of the United States, Mr. Barack Obama, the 44th,  has refused to meet with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Christian Broadcasting Network wrote of the historic significance of Israel’s Prime Minister, Netanyahu’s arrival and the apocalyptic Toranical and biblical timing of Bibi’s speech on the eve of Purim, a Holy day of Fasting and prayer for Jews and Christians who celebrate Holy Days in both of their faiths united by the Word.

In the days ahead, Jews around the world will celebrate Purim, a festival the Bible directs us to remember, when the Jewish people were delivered more than 2,000 years ago in Persia (modern day Iran) from an evil anti-Semite –Haman — who had manipulated the king into issuing a decree that would annihilate the Jews.

According to the biblical account, Esther, a Jew, and her cousin, Mordecai, who raised her, were the instruments of deliverance.

This Tuesday, just hours before the Purim holiday begins, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will address the U.S. Congress, at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, to explain why his country cannot tolerate the threat from another group of evil anti-Semites in Iran to annihilate the Jews: the acquisition of nuclear weapons by the Ayatollah Khamenei and his government…

In the meantime, the gravity of the world situation and the daily reports of the persecution and murder of Christians and Jews has focused the attention of millions of Christians, as well as Jews, on what Netanyahu has to say. Many will pray and intercede, and others will fast, as Esther and her people did in biblical times.

We will pray for Israel, for Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel’s leaders, for wisdom for our own leaders, and for discernment to navigate the dangerous waters ahead. Who knows whether, as in the days of Esther and Mordecai, the address wasn’t appointed “for such a time as this…

~ John Waage, Senior Editor CBN

Read More:

Choice words and phrases excerpted and proper attribution given to authors/publishers and the rest (article portions not in block quotes) written by M. Katherine Orts & Pastor David A. Orts founders of  USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny With Truth“ for The Glory of God IJN+ #USA #ProIsrael #ShalomJerusalem

Click for more Stories about Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu - We Love You BiBi -USA!!

#USAirforce Needs Reinforcing Now! #makeDClisten #tcot

Soldiers of the 82nd Airborne load into an Air Force C-141B Starlifter at Pope Air Force Base, N.C., for their parachute jump over the Sicily Drop Zone at Fort Bragg, N.C., on Nov. 3, 2000. Five thousand 82nd Airborne troops are taking part in an aerial assault exercise called Large Package Week. The quarterly training exercise sharpens the airdrop capability of aircrews from the Air Mobility Command and the 82nd Airborne.

Soldiers of the 82nd Airborne load into an Air Force C-141B Starlifter at Pope Air Force Base – DOD File Photo Kenn Mann U.S. Air Force. (Released)

“Your United States Air Force is still the best on the planet, but we mustn’t take that for granted because we are a force under strain,” James said. “And we mustn’t let our edge slip away.”

WASHINGTON, Feb. 27, 2015 – The Air Force is requesting $10 billion above what sequestration-level funding provides in order to support its global responsibilities, Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James told members of the House Appropriations Committee’s defense subcommittee here today.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James testifies before the House Appropriations Committee’s defense subcommittee in Washington, Feb. 27, 2015. James and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III met with the House members to discuss the Air Force’s fiscal year 2016 budget request. U.S. Air Force photo by Scott M. Ash
  

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

James said the potential return of sequestration jeopardizes the Air Force’s ability to sustain its various global missions and hampers its ability to focus on its main priorities: people, modernization and stewardship.

“Sequestration needs to be lifted, lifted permanently,” the secretary said.

read more

A Bowl Full of Reid’s Cherries For The Pickins At Americans Peril & Eternal Expense #MakeDCListen

snipshot.reid.gore.UNLV.mag.cover.2009

There seems to be a stealth master plan of sorts to utilize a variety of Federal Government agencies for nefarious purposes aimed at diminishing or, removing altogether, the rights of the average hard-working, tax paying American citizen. Every State in the union should be on high alert that they might be next for Federal mandated selection by any variety of Federal ‘tools’ such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)  to selectively pinpoint Americans staying true to the US Constitution and to Liberty within it’s well defined text as stated in The Declaration of Independence. We here at USDefenseLeague challenge all 50 States to immediately re-claim all non-ceded, or previously ceded lands and territories back from the increasing usurper of rights and freedoms the US Federal Government. We, like the Bundy’s believe that every State in our US Republic is sovereign. We are Federalists. That means we believe in State’s rights trumping Federal rights as per the 10th Amendment in our US Constitution.

Related Post: 

So we begin, at the beginning, with environmentally micro-focused and extraordinarily mis-aligned executor of all things Federal, the current US Senate Majority Leader  (D-Nevada) Harry Reid. Senator Reid’s pet projects just can’t get any wilder or should we say carnivorous! Just look here: read more

Record High in U.S. Say Big Government Greatest Threat

This new poll from Gallup just goes to show that the large majority of Americans believe that big government is in fact NOT the answer. Hopefully this sentiment continues and carries into the 2014 election cycle, and those who believe in big government and are in office now will have already been voted out this time next year. –PBN

PRINCETON, NJ — Seventy-two percent of Americans say big government is a greater threat to the U.S. in the future than is big business or big labor, a record high in the nearly 50-year history of this question. The prior high for big government was 65% in 1999 and 2000. Big government has always topped big business and big labor, including in the initial asking in 1965, but just 35% named it at that time.

Trend: Views of Biggest Threat to U.S. in Future

The latest update comes from a Dec. 5-8 poll. Gallup has documented a steady increase in concern about big government since 2009, rising from 55% in March 2009 to 64% in November 2011 and 72% today. This suggests that government policies specific to the period, such as the Affordable Care Act — perhaps coupled with recent revelations of government spying tactics by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden — may be factors. read more

Business Moron Obama Loses $55.5-Billion in Tax Payer Dollars/ Revenues with Sneaky Co-opt and Premature Selling of GM Stock

GMObama’s plan was to get out, and guess who footed the bill and took the loss. We did!!

Was it sold early or is Obama planning a cataclysmic correction using the Fed? Hyper Inflation?

The federal government on Monday sold its remaining shares of General Motors Co. stock, ending the controversial $49.5-billion bailout of the automaker with an approximately $10.5-billion loss for taxpayers.

It gets worse, folks:

1) GM is on pace to sell less vehicles in 2013 compared to 2008; the year which led to the bailout. In 2012, GM also sold less vehicles than 2008.

2) GM had revenue of $150 billion in 2012. It was $149 billion in 2008.

This is no typo my friends: GM sold less units in the-bailout-worked 2012 vs. my-God-save-us-from-Bush 2008, and total revenue in dollar terms differs by only one billion! read more

History of Shutdowns from 1976 – Obamacare Benedict Arnolds – Traitors to America From Undocumented Democrats

From 1976, US Federal Government has been shut down on 18 occasions predominately by the Democratic party.  America, particularly the GOP, please share the truth about the past and all the DEM related tirades that shut the USA Government down.  -PBN

The last shutdown happened during President Clinton's time in office.

Rep. Pat Meehan (R-Pa.): “At this point, I believe it’s time for the House to vote for a clean, short-term funding bill to bring the Senate to the table and negotiate a responsible compromise.” [Press Release, 10/1/13]

Rep. Scott Rigell (R-Va.): “Time for a clean [continuing resolution].” [Official Twitter, 10/1/13]

Rep. Jon Runyan (R-N.J.): “Enough is enough. Put a clean [continuing resolution] on the floor and let’s get on with the business we were sent to do.” [Burlington County Times, 10/1/13]

Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.): A Fitzpatrick aide tells the Philadelphia Inquirer the congressman would support a clean funding bill if it came up for a vote. [Philadelphia Inquirer, 10/1/13]

Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.): Barletta said he would “absolutely” vote for a clean bill in order to avert a shut down of the government. [Bethlehem Morning Call, 10/1/13]

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.): King thinks House Republicans would prefer to avoid a shutdown and said he will only vote for a clean continuing resolution to fund the government, according to the National Review Online. [NRO, 9/30/13] read more

McCain’s New Resolution Changes Goal Of Mission: No Vote For Syrian War Turns To Yes

senate-approves-strike-on-syria-john-kerry-obama-warmongers

 

USA, The US Senate just approved a US Military strike upon Assad’s strongholds in Syria with an addendum. The McCain Resolution. The vote goes next, directly to the United States House floor, to be voted upon according to US Senate sources. We have taken, for all appearance’s sake, the side of our Islamic enemies the Syrian Rebels whom are entrenched with al-Qaeda leadership and terrorists.

The United States is in a “catch 22″ regarding read more

North Carolina governor signs extensive Voter ID law

North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) on Monday signed into law one of the nation’s most wide-ranging Voter ID laws.

The move is likely to touch off a major court battle over voting rights, and the Justice Department is weighing a challenge to the new law, which is the first to pass since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the Voting Rights Act.

The measure requires voters to present government-issued photo identification at the polls and shortens the early voting period from 17 to 10 days. It will also end pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-old voters who will be 18 on Election Day and eliminates read more