Clinton Allegedly CoveredUp Obama’s Fake Family Hushed Queen of England’s Archive Chief [2VIDEOS]

Clinton.w.Queen+Hosts+Reception+Deligates+London+Summit.
Hillary Clinton was sent, it is believed, under great emotional trauma and possible duress, allegedly on behalf of the President Barack Obama the 44th President in the White House, on a covert purposed mission to England in August 2009 prior to also traveling to the subsequent and very out of the way jaunt to Kenya, Africa for two weeks that same August 2009.

Hillary’s travel history reveals she was indeed in Kenya, Africa in August 4th through August 7th, 2009 officially meeting with the Somalian President, Shiekh Ahmed, but her published travel history omits the surprise visit to England to meet with the Queen of England’s Chief of Archives.

Hillary.Travel.History

read more

US Congress: Treason In Time of War Shall Be Punishable By Death #tcot


By Section 110 of Article III. of the Constitution of the United States, it is declared that:

“Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason.”

In 1790, the Congress of the United States enacted that:

“If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars.”

JAMES MADISON in the 43d number of the Federalist says:

“As treason may be committed against the United States the authority of the United States ought to be enabled to punish it: but as new tangled and artificial treasons have been the great engines by which violent factions, the natural offspring of free governments, have usually wreaked their alternate malignity on each other, the Convention has with great judgment opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger by inserting a Constitutional definition of the crime.”

The Constitution confines the crime of treason to two species; First, the levying of war against the United States; and Secondly, adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. In so doing the very words of the Statute of Treason of EDWARD the THIRD were adopted; and thus the framers of the Constitution recognized the well settled interpretation of these phrases in the administration of criminal law which has prevailed for centuries in England.

Treason, according to Lord COKK, is derived from trahir, signifying to betray; and trahison, by contraction, treason, is the betraying itself.

In England, high treason can only be committed against the KING, for the oath of allegiance is to the KING alone, as the only supreme Governor — he has no partners in the supremacy.

Hitherto, but few cases have occurred in the United States in which it has been necessary for the Federal Courts to act upon this important subject. In 1807 ERICK BALLMAN and SAMUEL SWARTWONT were committed to prison in the District of Columbia, on a charge of high treason against the United States. The prisoners were brought by a writ of habeas corpus before the Supreme Court of the United States. In delivering the opinion of the Court, Chief-Justice MARSHALL said:

“To constitute that specific crime for which the prisoners now before the Court have been commuted, war must be actually levied against the United States. However flagitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the Government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war. and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into operation by an assemblage of men for a purpose, treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed.” * * * * * * * “It is not the intention of the Court to say that no individual can be guilty of this crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men Be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men for a treasonable purpose to constitute levying of war. Crimes, so atrocious as those which have for their object the subversion by violence of those laws and those institutions which have been ordained in order to secure the peace and happiness of society, are not to escape punishment because they have not ripened into treason. The wisdom of the Legislature is competent to provide for the case.”

In the case of The United States vs. FRIES, Mr. Justice CHASE said on the trial, and stated the opinion of the Court to be,

“That if a body of people, conspire and meditate an insurrection to resist or oppose the execution of any statute of the United States by force, they are only guilty of a high misdemeanor; but if they proceed to carry such intention into execution by force, that they are guilty of the treason of levying war; and the quantum of the force employed neither lessens or increases the crime — whether by one hundred or one thousand persons is wholly immaterial;”

* * * “and that it is altogether immaterial whether the force used is sufficient to effectuate the object; any force connected with the intention will constitute the crime of levying war.”

In the case of the United States vs. AARON BURR, Chief-Justice MARSHALL said:

“There is no difficulty in affirming that there must be a war, or the crime of levying it cannot exist; but there would often be considerable difficulty in affirming that a particular act did or did not involve the person committing it in the guilt and in the fact of levying war. If, for example, an army should be actually raised for the avowed purpose of carrying on open war against the United States and subverting their Government, the point must be weighed very deliberately before a Judge would venture to decide that an overt act of levying war had not been committed by a Commissary of purchases who never saw the army, but who, knowing its object, and leaguing himself with the rebels supplied that army with provisions; or by a Recruiting-officer, holding a commission in the rebel service, who, though never in camp, executed the particular duty assigned to him.”

This able jurist, in the same case, states that the term “levying war,” as used in the Constitution of the United States, was unquestionably employed in the same sense in which it was understood in England and in this country, to have been used in the Statute of EDWARD III., from which it was borrowed, and refers to principles laid down by COKE, HALE, FOSTER, BLACKSTONE and HAWKINS.

FOSTER says:

“Attacking the King’s forces, in opposition to his authority, upon a march or in quarters, is levying war.”

And also that

“Holding a castle or fort against the King or his forces, if actual force be used in order to keep possession, is levying war.” — Sec. 4 Cranch Reps. 75, 137, Appendix 470-507.

FOSTER further states, in his valuable Treatise on Treason, that all insurrection, to effect certain innovations of a public and general concern, by an armed force, to be, in construction of law, high treason within the clause of levying war. He farther says:

“An assembly armed and arrayed in a warlike manner for a treasonable purpose is bellum, levatum, though not bellum percussum; listing and marching are sufficient overt acts, without coming to a battle or action. So cruising on the King’s subjects, under a French Commission, France being then at war with us, was held to be adhering to the King’s enemies, though no other act of hostility be proved.” — See 4 Cranch, pp. 478,479:

Lord COKE says: “If many conspire to levy war, and some of them do levy the same, according to the conspiracy this is high treason in all.” “Why? Because all were legally present when the war was levied? No. “For in treason,” continues Lord COKE, “all be principals and war is levied.” This doctrine of Lord COKE has been adopted by all subsequent writers; and it is generally laid down in the English books that whatever will make a man an accessory in felony will make him a principal in treason:

“It is well known,” says FOSTER, ” that in the language of the law there are no accessories in high treason — all are principals. Every instance of incitement, aid, or protection, which in case of felony will render a man an accessory before or after the fact, in the case of high treason, whether it be treason at common law or by statute, will make him a principal in treason.”

“The propriety of investing the National Government.” says Mr. Justice STORY, in his Commentaries on the Constitution, “with authority to punish the crime of treason against the United States, could never become a question with any persons who deem ed the National Government worthy of creation or preservation. If the power had not been expressly granted, it must have been implied, unless all the powers of the National Government might be put at defiance and prostrated with impunity. Two motives probably concurred in introducing it as an express power. One was, not to leave it open to implication whether it was to be exclusively punished with death, according to the known rule of the common law, and with the barbarous accompaniments pointed out by it — but to confide the punishment to the discretion of Congress. The other was, to impose some limitation upon the nature and extent of the punishment, so that it should not work corruption of blood or forfeiture beyond the life of the offender.”

Treason has ever been deemed the highest crime which can be committed in civil society; since its aim is an overthrow of the Government and a public resistance by force of its just powers, its tendency is to create universal danger and alarm, and on this account it has often been visited with the deepest public resentment. Hence, by the common law, the the punishment of high treason was accompanied by all the refinements in cruelty which were oftentimes literally and studiously executed. But under the Constitution of the United States the power of punishing the crime of treason against the United States is exclusive in Congress; and the trial of the offence belongs exclusively to the Federal tribunals. A State cannot take cognizance or punish the offence, whatever it may do in relation to the offence of treason committed exclusively against itself.

Source: Ratification of US Constitution 1790 EXCERPT Article Published January 25, 1861 Public Domain

Dangerous Myth of Moderate Muslims & Islamic Law of Abrogation #Sharia #Iran

…It is probably true that in every faith, ordinary people will pick the parts they like best and practise those, while the scholars will work out an official version. In Islam the scholars had a particularly challenging task, given the mass of contradictory texts within the Qur’an. To meet this challenge they developed the rule of abrogation which states that wherever contradictions are found, the later-dated text abrogates the earlier one. To elucidate further the original intention of Muhammad, they referred to traditions (hadith) recording what he himself had said and done. Sadly for the rest of the world, both these methods led Islam away from peace and towards war. For the peaceable verses of the Qur’an are almost all earlier, dating from Muhammad’s time in Mecca, while those which advocate war and violence are almost all later, dating from after his flight to Medina. Though “jihad” has a variety of meanings including a spiritual struggle against sin, Muhammad’s own example shows clearly that he frequently interpreted jihad as literal warfare and himself ordered massacre, assassination and torture. From these sources the Islamic scholars developed a detailed theology dividing the world into two parts Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam, with Muslims required to change Dar al-Harb into Dar al-Islam either through warfare or by da’wa (mission).

So the mantra “Islam is peace” which we hear repeated in the media so often is almost 1400 years out of date. It was only for about thirteen years that Islam was peace and nothing but peace. From 622 onwards, it became increasingly aggressive, albeit with periods of peaceful co-existence particularly in colonial times, when the theology of war was not dominant. For today’s radical Muslims – just as for the medieval jurists who developed classical Islam – it would be truer to say “Islam is war”. One of the most radical Islamic groups in Britain, al-Ghurabaa, stated in the wake of the two London bombings, “Any Muslim that denies that terror is a part of Islam is kafir.” A kafir is an unbeliever (i.e. a non-Muslim), a term of gross insult.

Excerpted from:

THE MYTH OF MODERATE ISLAM

by Patrick Sookhdeo

–Dr Patrick Sookhdeo is Director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity. He is also an ordained priest in the Church of England.

Russian analyst “Yellowstone National Park a good target for US nuclear attack”. #PJNET #TCOT

Russian-Bear
The United States has been weakened, perhaps critically,  by both the Democratic party and the RINO, whose mission has been to lessen, not strengthen the stature and abilities of our place in the world.

Now that the Congress is back in the hands (partially anyway) of the adults, the world is beginning to understand that we intend to keep our God given freedoms, and extend liberty abroad to those who follow our laws, and protect our interest both foreign and domestic. This should not put us in a precarious position, but it may if we continue to show weakness and stupidity aka bowing to foreign kings and playing with red reset buttons. We have always been and will always be at war with Islam, Russia and China. In a fight, if your opponent is down, you finish them, is the USA down? The following article speaks to that. –@PushBackNow

March 31st 2015 a Russian geopolitical analyst says the best way to attack the United States is to detonate nuclear weapons to trigger a supervolcano at Yellowstone National Park or along the San Andreas fault line on California’s coast.

Conspiracy theory: The president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems based in Moscow, Konstantin Sivkov.The president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems based in Moscow, Konstantin Sivkov said in an article for a Russian trade newspaper on, that Russia needed to increase its military weapons and strategies against the “West” which was “moving to the borders or Russia”.

He has a conspiracy theory that NATO – a political and military alliance which counts the US, UK, Canada and many countries in western Europe as members – was amassing strength against Russia and the only way to combat that problem was to attack America’s vulnerabilities to ensure a “complete destruction of the enemy”.

Geologists believe that the Yellowstone supervolcano could explode at any moment. There are signs of growing activity there. Therefore it suffices to push the relatively small, for example the impact of the munition megaton class to initiate an eruption. The consequences will be catastrophic for the United States – a country just disappears,” he said.

“Another vulnerable area of ​​the United States from the geophysical point of view, is the San Andreas fault – 1300 kilometers between the Pacific and North American plates … a detonation of a nuclear weapon there can trigger catastrophic events like a coast-scale tsunami which can completely destroy the infrastructure of the United States.”

He said the Russian geography on the other hand would protect it from a tsunami or a volcano attack. Few people live on the coast in Russia and Siberia which rests on basalt would withstand similar attacks.

Russian target number 2: The San Andreas fault line, here pictured on the Carrizo Plain in California.Russian target number 2: The San Andreas fault line, here pictured on the Carrizo Plain in California.

Mr Sivkov, who spoke at the 2013 Moscow Economic Forum, said by 2020 to 2025 Russia would have amassed “asymmetric weapons” in its arsenal for the attack.

“The situation for us today is comparably worse than half a century ago,” he said.

“The weakened economic potential in Russia, the loss of the ‘spiritual core of what was the communist idea’, and the lack of large-scale community allies in Europe such as the Warsaw Pact, Russia simply cannot compete against the NATO and its allies.”

In December last year, the vocal military strategist told Russian newspaper, Pravda.ruthat there is a “developing standoff between Russia and the West” and the US’s ultimate goal was to “destroy Russia”.

Mr Sivkov accused American politicians of committing several crimes including causing the deaths of 1,200,000 people in Iraq. He believed the only way for the “American elite” to be held accountable was for its military forces to be destroyed.

“American politicians have committed a variety of crimes. Will anyone be held accountable for those crimes? What about the international law, the UN and other organisations? Are they doing anything?” he asked.

Mr Sivkov told Pravda that the idea of the US preparing for a serious war against Russia using cruise missiles was plausible given that it had already launched a thousand missiles in Yugoslavia and Iraq.

h/t Su-Lin Tan and SMH

#FalseGateStory! #FortMeade #MD #NSA MSM Changed Headlines To Accommodate Facts [VIDEO]

 

 

FortMeade MD Fatality seen draped With white sheet after shooting at gate of NSA

FortMeade MD Fatality seen draped With white sheet after shooting at gate of NSA

Yet another headline changed to accommodate the facts as they emerge. Chicago Tribune posts Wapo article with this headline dated March 30,2015:

FortMeade.HeadlineChange

 

3.31.2015 Updated 12:12AM EST We now have a name of one of the survivors who was in the stolen SUV vehicle. Kevin Fleming, 20 years old, of Baltimore Maryland. Michael Savage, speaker, author, and talk show host of the radio show ‘The Savage Nation,” reported his name during his show late last evening. It appears Fleming has a criminal record details are not yet known. The name of his cohort who was killed remains undisclosed at present as well as the owner’s name of the SUV and the injured police officer working for the NSA.

Updated 6:10pm EST: The two men shot by the NSA Federal police, were heading AWAY from the NSA as seen in the incident scene where the, cross-dressing, confused (and possibly high on some sort of substance) men were both shot. One man was shot to death. The second man was severely wounded and is in critical condition. Reports say he may not survive. The two men had allegedly stolen the black SUV from another man whom they had spent the night with at a Motel. Their relationship with each other and the third man is unknown at this time. It was reported by the local police that the man left at the hotel had indeed called his car in as stolen. Is this a cover story by NSA? They didn’t initially say they pulled them over or ordered them to stop due to a police report of any kind. We will let you know. Please notice the directions of vehicles and the location of the NSA versus the road to the Parkway/highway entrance.

FortMeade.Security.Checkpoint.car.headed.AWAY.fromNSA

Updated 4:20pmEST Washington Post reported: “The vehicle slammed into a police cruiser after shots were fired.”

One person was killed and another was injured Monday morning when police with the National Security Agency opened fire on a vehicle whose driver refused commands to stop at a security gate, according to a statement from the agency.

The vehicle slammed into a police cruiser after shots were fired.

The NSA statement says the incident occurred shortly before 9 a.m. when the vehicle entered the NSA complex off the Baltimore Washington Parkway in Anne Arundel County and “failed to obey an NSA police officer’s routine instructions for safely exiting the secure campus.” The statement says security barriers were raised.

The NSA said that the “vehicle accelerated toward an NSA police vehicle blocking the road” and that police “fired at the vehicle.” It then crashed into the police vehicle.

Amy J. Thoreson, a spokeswoman for the FBI, said in a statement that authorities “do not believe [the incident] is related to terrorism.” WaPo

AP now wanting to get ahead of all other media. Note the time stamp of 3:55pmEST in its next updated story is over half an hour ahead of current time at time of this post 3:23PMEST See screenshot:

NSA.time.stamp.ap.article.one hour ahead

3:05PM EST Fox now reporting crossdressing men appeared to be “on something” and men refused to turn around (at checkpoint) so barricades were erected and they were then shot, one to death, the other hanging on for his life. No weapons reported were in the men’s car or in their hands or on their person. How do we know if these guys weren’t in need of medical attention in lieu of execution? M. Katherine Orts Pastor’s wife to David A. Orts~ USDefenseLeague.com

AP News finally catching up to our factual report just about half an hour ago. Here’s a screenshot of their twitter feed.

AP.catching.up Fort.Mead

Shepard Smith of Fox News, still misreporting that a gate at NSA was rammed by two cross-dressing men in SUV. “Deadly faceoff… Military had to shoot because gate was being rammed. That would be inaccurate reporting. And for all stating this is not terrorism. How would you know yet?

Updated:2:30PM EST

Initial Story by ABC has evidently been deleted just checked to see 2:22pmEST Is there a whitewash or cover-up, if so of of what exactly? We hear the Obama admin at the White House was starting to involve itself.

Capture

2:25pmEST Foxnews is still misreporting the facts as are most of the MSM. The gate was not breached, rammed or was there ever any attempt to ram the gate at the NSA at Fort Meade, MD. In addition, Fox News is just now reporting that a NSA cop was injured. What’s the delay about?

Updated 1245PM EST: USDefenseLeague seeks facts and appears to be one of the few not jumping on the bandwagon of rushing to conclusions before those facts are in. We reported there was no ramming at the gate of the NSA located in Fort Meade, MD. Neither was there even an attempt to ram the gate since the alleged attackers were neutralized prior during a motor vehicle collision between a black SUV and a Federal NSA vehicle in which shots were fired at the alleged two “cross dressing“ males. We do not yet know if the alleged attackers were armed or unarmed. The local police force was reporting two individuals showed up at the gate already injured. ~ M. Katherine Orts

Here’s a screen grab of another prominent news outlet changing its headline: Notice they now say shot outside gate and blame shooting on trying to ram past a checkpoint????

Shot.checkpoint.not.gate.FortMeade.MD

Update9:47AM EST: Black SUV initially thought to have attempted to ram gate had, in fact, collided with a police vehicle, which then allegedly (Federal NSA police officers) fired upon the occupants of the vehicle, two males who were dressed as women. Information obtained through variety of local sources. NSA put out different initial story of “incident at the gate with two individuals being treated“ official initial statement of NSA“ and NSA spokesperson is still not reportedly commenting to reporters on scene. ~ USDefenseLeague.com

Update 9:30AM EST:

FBI and ATF now on scene at Fort Meade, MD.  One of the men dressed as a woman is dead after attempting to ram the gated entrance of the NSA with a black SUV. One NSA police officer is believed to be shot in the arm and is being treated on site. ~ USDefenseLeague.com

Update 9AM EST— Two men, dressed as women, attempted to ram the gate at the NSA headquarters located at Fort Meade, MD. The guard at the gate, open fired upon the vehicle. One man is dead. Two men are injured.~ USDefenseLeague.com

FORT MEADE, Md. (WJLA/CNN) – Two men tried to ram the main gate to enter the National Security Agency headquarters at Fort Meade, a federal law enforcement official briefed on the situation told CNN.

An NSA police officer shot one of the men dead, and seriously injured the second, the source told CNN.

NewsChopper 7 video showed two damaged vehicles near the main gate and emergency workers loading an injured man into an ambulance.

There was no explanation yet of what the motivation was for the incident, and no identities of those involved was available yet.

The NSA headquarters is located on the sprawling Fort Meade Army installation near Baltimore.

Initial Local Source: ABC 7 News will update this story as more information become available.

Follow us: @ABC7News on Twitter | WJLATV on Facebook

#Iran States Obama Aiding #ISIS

 

According to FARS news media, what appears to be Iran’s official media outlet, the US Military, under Obama’s command has been dropping weapons, food, ammo, incredible support purposefully to the enemy ISIS at pre-arranged drops. There is alleged open communication with the enemies of ISIS/IS while our supposed allies are fighting alongside our own US Military against ISIS.

Treason plain and simple is staring us and Israel in the face vis-a-vis Barack Obama and every appointee who obeys his traitorous plans.

Obama refuses to call the Islamic State Islamic or call it ISIS or IS. Obama will only call Islamic State ISIL. Why?

Because, the name of the enemy matters. ISIL refers to the Levant in ancient Mesopotamia and neglects the existence of Israel and its total Toranical/Biblical God given Promise of Israel’s boundaries in history and that Jerusalem is promised by G-d Himself to be the Eternal capital of the New Jerusalem forever.

Promised Land of Israel History Facts: Here’s a Quick Fact to share with all those who have been siding with the terrorist enemies of Israel aka Hamas and all of Islam:

This is a highly important factual piece of history regarding the geographical history of the origination of the Palestinians and the land which they are derived from. The Palestinians do not have historical origins from the land of what was and what is still Israel, even the disputed portions of the Gaza strip. The Palestinians are geographically NOT from Israel but from under the governance of the Ottoman Kingdom under the Province of Beirut, then Mesopotamia then Jordan then Trans-Jordan and the Arab Palestinians were not content with any of portions of the land given to them as they claimed the ENTIRE Middle East. Such is the mentality of ISIS/ISIL IS Islamic State and the OIC via the aid of the UN ‪to take over all the land on the entire earth. ~MKO

Levant.Kingdoms.commons

Kingdoms of The Levant

 

Related Recent & Archived Posts:

No wonder the hostility between Barack Obama and the newly re-elected leader of Israel, Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu has reached new deplorable one-sided heights.

Obama threatened to remove US support for Israel in future meetings at the UN (United Nations). PM Netanyahu, when broached with topic of Obama’s alleged threat at the UN simply stated. ” I hope that is not true.”

Netanyahu has been extraordinarily gracious to Mr. Obama in the midst of betrayals read more

#Israel “Which Side Are You On?” Voting Polls Are Open! #BibiNetanyahu #StandwIsrael [2VIDEOS] #Esther414

Pray for the Israeli election today USA, for The Lord Yeshua Ha Mashiach (Jesus God’s Son) to protect Israel and guide the hands of each Israeli citizen voter. The very survival of Israel and ultimately the USA is at stake. ~ USDefenseLeague.com

Polls have opened in Israel’s election as Benjamin Netanyahu fights to remain the country’s prime minister. More than 5.8 million people are eligible to vote up until 8pm GMT in 10,372 polling stations nationwide. ~ SkyNews

“For if you remain silent at this time, relief and rescue will arise for the Jews from elsewhere, and you and your father’s household will perish; and who knows whether at a time like this you will attain the kingdom?” Esther 4.14
יד.כִּי אִם הַחֲרֵשׁ תַּחֲרִישִׁי בָּעֵת הַזֹּאת רֶוַח וְהַצָּלָה יַעֲמוֹד לַיְּהוּדִים מִמָּקוֹם אַחֵר וְאַתְּ וּבֵית אָבִיךְ תֹּאבֵדוּ וּמִי יוֹדֵעַ אִם לְעֵת כָּזֹאת הִגַּעַתְּ לַמַּלְכוּת:

God Bless Israel and Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, Freedom’s and USA’s best friend of all. ~ USDefenseLeague.com

Videos: Israel’s Foreign Affair Ministry

USA’s PBN Welcomes PM Benjamin “Bibi“ .@Netanyahu “For Such A Time is This…“ #Purim #Fast&Pray #Israel

In the Prime Minister of Israel’s own words…

“I’m going to Washington on a fateful, even historic, mission,” he said as he boarded his plane in Tel Aviv. “I feel that I am an emissary of all Israel’s citizens, even those who do not agree with me, and of the entire Jewish people,” ~Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu  (Reuters)

spoken March 1st, 2015 as Benjamin “Bibi“ Netanyahu was boarding his plane from Israel to the United States in order to give a highly important speech Tuesday morning to our United States Congress.

Bibi’s speech before Congress will air on FoxNews Channel Tuesday morning. Check your local cable network for details

Mr. Netanyahu will be speaking on a topic of historic importance regarding Iran obtaining Nuclear weapons capabilities and Iran’s hostile intent to use those weapons to destroy Israel and even reach The United States of America.  The Obama administration has been aiding and abetting Iran and other Islamic nations and entities such as IS by not even speaking of the existence of radical Islam, Islamic Jihad or Iran and other Islamic nations to establish a one world order global Islamic Caliphate at the behest and approval of all 57 Islamic States who are members of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) not loosely, affiliated with the UN (United Nations).

For the very first time in the history of our two nation’s allegiance, The President of the United States, Mr. Barack Obama, the 44th,  has refused to meet with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Christian Broadcasting Network wrote of the historic significance of Israel’s Prime Minister, Netanyahu’s arrival and the apocalyptic Toranical and biblical timing of Bibi’s speech on the eve of Purim, a Holy day of Fasting and prayer for Jews and Christians who celebrate Holy Days in both of their faiths united by the Word.

In the days ahead, Jews around the world will celebrate Purim, a festival the Bible directs us to remember, when the Jewish people were delivered more than 2,000 years ago in Persia (modern day Iran) from an evil anti-Semite –Haman — who had manipulated the king into issuing a decree that would annihilate the Jews.

According to the biblical account, Esther, a Jew, and her cousin, Mordecai, who raised her, were the instruments of deliverance.

This Tuesday, just hours before the Purim holiday begins, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will address the U.S. Congress, at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, to explain why his country cannot tolerate the threat from another group of evil anti-Semites in Iran to annihilate the Jews: the acquisition of nuclear weapons by the Ayatollah Khamenei and his government…

In the meantime, the gravity of the world situation and the daily reports of the persecution and murder of Christians and Jews has focused the attention of millions of Christians, as well as Jews, on what Netanyahu has to say. Many will pray and intercede, and others will fast, as Esther and her people did in biblical times.

We will pray for Israel, for Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel’s leaders, for wisdom for our own leaders, and for discernment to navigate the dangerous waters ahead. Who knows whether, as in the days of Esther and Mordecai, the address wasn’t appointed “for such a time as this…

~ John Waage, Senior Editor CBN

Read More:

Choice words and phrases excerpted and proper attribution given to authors/publishers and the rest (article portions not in block quotes) written by M. Katherine Orts & Pastor David A. Orts founders of  USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny With Truth“ for The Glory of God IJN+ #USA #ProIsrael #ShalomJerusalem

Click for more Stories about Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu - We Love You BiBi -USA!!

#USAirforce Needs Reinforcing Now! #makeDClisten #tcot

Soldiers of the 82nd Airborne load into an Air Force C-141B Starlifter at Pope Air Force Base, N.C., for their parachute jump over the Sicily Drop Zone at Fort Bragg, N.C., on Nov. 3, 2000. Five thousand 82nd Airborne troops are taking part in an aerial assault exercise called Large Package Week. The quarterly training exercise sharpens the airdrop capability of aircrews from the Air Mobility Command and the 82nd Airborne.

Soldiers of the 82nd Airborne load into an Air Force C-141B Starlifter at Pope Air Force Base – DOD File Photo Kenn Mann U.S. Air Force. (Released)

“Your United States Air Force is still the best on the planet, but we mustn’t take that for granted because we are a force under strain,” James said. “And we mustn’t let our edge slip away.”

WASHINGTON, Feb. 27, 2015 – The Air Force is requesting $10 billion above what sequestration-level funding provides in order to support its global responsibilities, Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James told members of the House Appropriations Committee’s defense subcommittee here today.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James testifies before the House Appropriations Committee’s defense subcommittee in Washington, Feb. 27, 2015. James and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III met with the House members to discuss the Air Force’s fiscal year 2016 budget request. U.S. Air Force photo by Scott M. Ash
  

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

James said the potential return of sequestration jeopardizes the Air Force’s ability to sustain its various global missions and hampers its ability to focus on its main priorities: people, modernization and stewardship.

“Sequestration needs to be lifted, lifted permanently,” the secretary said.

read more

ISIS Film Luring Lone Wolfs To Strike USA? #makeDClisten #tcot #Shoebat

ISIS is pushing what they termed “Lone Wolf Agenda” and has produced a promotional video for Muslims living in the U.S., Canada and Europe to kill whom they termed “Crusaders” even including the cover on one promotional piece with “War On The Cross” against the U.S Coalition depicting President Obama burning in flames.
DogsOfRome.Shoebat article.02.21.2015
CAPTION ON RIGHT: “Islamic State Challenges The World And Liberates Muslims”. CAPTION ON LEFT: “War On The Cross” with subtitle “The Dogs Of Rome Are Barking In Our Lands”.

Folks have been wondering who is producing these quality videos by ISIS. The firm is called Turjman Asawirti For International Productions which dedicates most of its work for ISIS. read more

TedCruz refuses to tow the RINO line or allow Obama to lie and whine. #MakeDCListen Includes The Federalist #69 RT to @BarackObama [VIDEO]

senator-ted-cruz1

 “I’m the president, not a dictator” -BO

“To be clear, the dispute over executive amnesty is not between President Obama and Republicans in Congress; it is a dispute between President Obama and the American people.” –Ted Cruz

Many had a dream for our first Black President, predominantly black Americans, as he or she would be our very first black president, that’s why they turned out with over a 90 percentile vote for Obama (King must be doing somersault in his grave) Maybe these voters, many of whom had never voted, and honestly were uninformed about politics, and  particularly about Obama’s, jaded and quite honestly vile past which has caused deleterious effects  to many people’s lives. What they thought perhaps  was he’s someone like Martin Luther King, Jr., who dreamed of a future nation for his four children, void of race “. . . a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” Enter Obama , smooth, convincing, educated, and he plead a case for unity, not left or right but an all inclusive nation, he spoke a message of healing and truth. He “preached” about transparency in DC, and some, the uninformed in our nation, had hope beyond hope. Youth and minorities wanted a hip  and “caring for the cause” president.  But most of them now know the truth, and it is something far different. What they got in the first black US president (technically bi-racial) was not a dream, but a nightmare.  His “amnesty” order will be hurting minorities the most and they’re already hurting the most. Painfully and deeply in the lack of job opportunities, murder, substance abuse, broken homes, fatherless children, poverty and otherobama_king areas. The truth is Obama doesn’t care for anyone but Obama and his legacy. We’re here on the front lines with you Patriot Brothers and Sisters, and yes we’re waiting, waiting for our lawbreaking President to once again arrest the attention of legal U.S. tax paying citizens, along with those here illegally, those who are invading our country and burdening every aspect of our Federal and States systems. to again, break US Law. Obama’s own words make the best case against his lawless action. We are certainly praying for, and are hopeful that, Speaker Boehner & Senate Elect Majority Leader Mitch McConnell know that the American people have given them, and every member of the right side of the aisle another opportunity to show We The People that they can lead. Mitch  McConnell and John Boehner  would both do well in listening to intellectually honest, well spoken Patriots and colleague, Senators Mike Lee and Ted Cruz, who agree on what Ted Cruz wrote in the excerpt from Politico.

The Constitution designs a system of checks and balances for our nation, and executive amnesty for immigrants here illegally unilaterally decreed from the White House would seriously undermine the rule of law. Our founders repeatedly warned about the dangers of unlimited power within the executive branch; Congress should heed those words as the president threatens to grant amnesty to millions of people who have come to our country illegally. To be clear, the dispute over executive amnesty is not between President Obama and Republicans in Congress; it is a dispute between President Obama and the American people. The Democrats suffered historic losses in the midterm elections largely over the prospect of the president’s executive amnesty. President Obama was correct: His policies were on the ballot across the nation in 2014. The elections were a referendum on amnesty, and the voters soundly rejected it. There was no ambiguity. [read more]

The following is a must read for the POTUSTedCruzExecAmnesty

In Chapter 69, the president would be elected for a term of four years; he would be eligible for re-election. He would not have the life tenure of an hereditary monarch. The president would be liable to impeachment, trial, and removal from office upon being found guilty of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. He would be accountable at all times to the country at large.

The president was also to be the commander-in-chief of all regular United States military forces and of the state militias when called into national service. The president would have only occasional command of the state militias, and only when authorized by the Congress.

In addition, the president would have the power to pardon all offenders except those found guilty in an impeachment trial. He would regulate foreign relations with the advice and consent of the Senate, and have other extensive powers. But since a president was to be elected every four years, he could not possibly become a “perpetual and hereditary prince” like the despised and “tyrannical” King George III of Britain.

In Chapter 70, there were some who argued that a vigorous executive was inconsistent with republican principles. All men of sense agreed, said Hamilton, about the “necessity of an energetic executive.” That necessary energy would come from unity, duration, adequate provision for its support, and competent powers. The first need was “due dependence on the people”; the second, due responsibility.

As to unity, Hamilton argued (largely to himself), that executive powers should be concentrated in a single chief magistrate, and not in a council or anything of that sort. The history of Rome and the ancient Greek republics proved this, as well as the operations under various state governments. As chief magistrate, the president should bear sole responsibility for his acts. There was no need of a “council to the executive.”

In Chapter 71, this is a prolix essay on why the president’s term in office should be limited and why a new election to the presidency should be held periodically: every four years, as proposed. Four years would be long enough, but not too long. That period would keep the president responsive to the changing views and interests of the people if he hoped for re-election.

In Chapter 72, the president should be eligible for re-election. Otherwise, the chief magistrate might become irresponsible. Knowing that he would not be called to account by the people for whatever he did, he might do whatever he pleased, making himself a fortune while he could.

A man having served four years as president would have more knowledge of statecraft and the inner workings of the government than one who had not. To exclude a president from seeking to succeed himself might well result in the “fatal inconveniences of fluctuating councils and a variable policy.”

In Chapter 73, the vigor of the executive branch depended on adequate provision for its support, to be determined by Congress. It was possible that Congress might decide to “starve” an unpopular president by reducing or abolishing his salary, or “tempt him by largesses” to surrender his judgment and discretion.

No provision in the proposed constitution was more “judicious” than this, said Hamilton: The president would receive for his services a compensation “which shall neither be increased nor diminished, during the period for which he shall have been elected, . . . and shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States or any of them.” This would make the president financially independent and free to move as his judgment dictated.

The president should have the power to exercise a qualified negative over the acts of the two legislative bodies. He could return all bills he objected to so that they could not become laws unless subsequently passed again, this time by a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress. This would protect the president from having his powers whittled away by the legislature, and be a safeguard against hasty and ill-considered legislation. This would tend toward greater stability in government. To avoid a clash with the legislature, the president would be inclined to use his qualified veto cautiously.

In Chapter 74, among other requisite powers, the president was to be commander-in-chief of all regular United States military forces and of the state militias “when called into the actual service of the United States.” The propriety and reasons for this were so obvious, said Hamilton, that there was no need to discuss them.

The president was to have the power to grant pardons and reprieves for offences against the United States, “except in cases of impeachment.” There had been little criticism of this, Hamilton noted, except in relation to treason. Some argued that one or both legislative houses should be brought into proceedings involving the possible pardon of anyone convicted of treason. Hamilton saw some merit in that view, but concluded by saying that the power of granting pardons in treason cases should be left solely in the hands of the president, for “in seasons of insurrection or rebellion” the president could act more decisively and judiciously in granting amnesties. This might prevent the contending groups from coming to a violent and possibly disastrous collision.

[jwplayer mediaid=”194035″]