At one point Hillary Clinton says, “There has to be a Reckoning. I agree with you.” to head of movement #BlackLivesMatter
H/T Good Magazine
At one point Hillary Clinton says, “There has to be a Reckoning. I agree with you.” to head of movement #BlackLivesMatter
H/T Good Magazine
— NYPD NEWS (@NYPDnews) August 18, 2015
Women’s lives matter don’t they? In Islam, women are subjugated, they are less than second-class citizens. We’d like to know who authorized this official @NYPD outing to the local mosque? Where are the female police officers? We know. In Islam, the opposite sexes are not allowed to sit next to each other or even worship together. The truth is that mosques are strongholds for the political militant ideologies maintained by all true Muslims. Islam is not a religion. It is a faux religion of ‘peace’ it is a political militant ideological government at war with our US government, our US constitution and everything that is American. Have you not heard the death chants “Death to America” “Death to Israel” from the Iranian government which is an Islamic Republic? That is true Islam. We are appalled our brave men in Blue would allow themselves to be entangled in such a trap. NYC is still ground zero for all Americans. Let us #NeverForget ~ M. Katherine Orts Pastor’s wife to David A. Orts founders of USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny with Truth” & WorldWideBroadcasters.com “Reaching The Globe With Truth for the Nations”
“But, Obama I think was very careful. He’s a lawyer and he knows the difference between legality versus legitimacy,” meticulously stated by Mr. Hassan Omar, a member of the Kenyan opposition Party on his shared opinion (among rest of Kenyan Opposition Party leaders) of POTUS Mr. Barack Obama, July 28th, 2015 on KTN News Kenya with fellow Kenyan Opposition Party officials.
Mr. Omar was speaking on the decision regarding Kenya’s Supreme Court opinion on the legality versus the legitimacy of the nation’s Presidential election’s voting results in the last election held in 2013 nationwide and how it related to Barack Obama’s interaction with them with a lawyer’s knowledge. The winning votes had a razor thin margin in favor of the current Kenyan leader President Kenyetta. The electronic machines were out of order before the tallying of the final official Kenyan Presidential results. And the contender raised concerns that the votes were being doctored and the vote counting process should be stopped until properly vetted by others. Raila Odinga’s running mate stated, “ ~ by M. Katherine Orts reporting for USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny With Truth & WorldWideBroadcasters.com “Reaching The Globe for The Glory of God in Jesus Name+ ”
We dedicate this in honor of @POTUS @DonLemon showing their catalytic “True Colors” using the actual N- word as part of their public relations repertoire invariably and predictably inciting racial tension amongst the race baiters of society.
During his interview with podcaster/comedian Marc Maron, President Obama said that racism doesn’t just mean someone going around and dropping the n-word. Except he used the actual n-word, not “n-word.”
That really took people aback and set Fox News off, but CNN’s Don Lemon said this afternoon it was “about time he said it.”
Reluctant H/T to Mediaite
Josh Earnest to reporters, “Welcome back…Secret Service says “telephonic bomb threat was called in. Bomb sweep was done”
John “Who turned off our cameras? The cameras belong to our news agencies. These cameras were…tampered with so we couldn’t see what was going on.”
Updated2:56pm by M. Katherine Orts Pastor’s wife to David A. Orts reporting for & founders of USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny With Truth”
Washington DC – by Nicole Duran
Reporters at the White House were evacuated around 2 p.m. Tuesday afternoon from the briefing room as press secretary Josh Earnest was giving his daily briefing.
No reason was given and as far as was apparent, West Wing and Old Executive Office Building personnel were not asked to leave the complex.
After a few minutes outside, Secret Service members then ushered the journalists into the South Court Auditorium in the Old Executive Office Building. No instructions were given and the press corps was awaiting directions in a cell-serviceless auditorium.
This story was last updated at 2:25 p.m.
Source: Washington Examiner – by Nicole Duran
— PushBackNow.com (@PushBackNow) March 2, 2015
In the Prime Minister of Israel’s own words…
“I’m going to Washington on a fateful, even historic, mission,” he said as he boarded his plane in Tel Aviv. “I feel that I am an emissary of all Israel’s citizens, even those who do not agree with me, and of the entire Jewish people,” ~Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu (Reuters)
spoken March 1st, 2015 as Benjamin “Bibi“ Netanyahu was boarding his plane from Israel to the United States in order to give a highly important speech Tuesday morning to our United States Congress.
Bibi’s speech before Congress will air on FoxNews Channel Tuesday morning. Check your local cable network for details
Mr. Netanyahu will be speaking on a topic of historic importance regarding Iran obtaining Nuclear weapons capabilities and Iran’s hostile intent to use those weapons to destroy Israel and even reach The United States of America. The Obama administration has been aiding and abetting Iran and other Islamic nations and entities such as IS by not even speaking of the existence of radical Islam, Islamic Jihad or Iran and other Islamic nations to establish a one world order global Islamic Caliphate at the behest and approval of all 57 Islamic States who are members of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) not loosely, affiliated with the UN (United Nations).
For the very first time in the history of our two nation’s allegiance, The President of the United States, Mr. Barack Obama, the 44th, has refused to meet with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Christian Broadcasting Network wrote of the historic significance of Israel’s Prime Minister, Netanyahu’s arrival and the apocalyptic Toranical and biblical timing of Bibi’s speech on the eve of Purim, a Holy day of Fasting and prayer for Jews and Christians who celebrate Holy Days in both of their faiths united by the Word.
In the days ahead, Jews around the world will celebrate Purim, a festival the Bible directs us to remember, when the Jewish people were delivered more than 2,000 years ago in Persia (modern day Iran) from an evil anti-Semite –Haman — who had manipulated the king into issuing a decree that would annihilate the Jews.
According to the biblical account, Esther, a Jew, and her cousin, Mordecai, who raised her, were the instruments of deliverance.
This Tuesday, just hours before the Purim holiday begins, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will address the U.S. Congress, at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, to explain why his country cannot tolerate the threat from another group of evil anti-Semites in Iran to annihilate the Jews: the acquisition of nuclear weapons by the Ayatollah Khamenei and his government…
In the meantime, the gravity of the world situation and the daily reports of the persecution and murder of Christians and Jews has focused the attention of millions of Christians, as well as Jews, on what Netanyahu has to say. Many will pray and intercede, and others will fast, as Esther and her people did in biblical times.
We will pray for Israel, for Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel’s leaders, for wisdom for our own leaders, and for discernment to navigate the dangerous waters ahead. Who knows whether, as in the days of Esther and Mordecai, the address wasn’t appointed “for such a time as this…
~ John Waage, Senior Editor CBN
Choice words and phrases excerpted and proper attribution given to authors/publishers and the rest (article portions not in block quotes) written by M. Katherine Orts & Pastor David A. Orts founders of USDefenseLeague.com “Pushing Back Tyranny With Truth“ for The Glory of God IJN+ #USA #ProIsrael #ShalomJerusalem
Click for more Stories about Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu – We Love You BiBi -USA!!
“I’m the president, not a dictator” -BO
“To be clear, the dispute over executive amnesty is not between President Obama and Republicans in Congress; it is a dispute between President Obama and the American people.” –Ted Cruz
Many had a dream for our first Black President, predominantly black Americans, as he or she would be our very first black president, that’s why they turned out with over a 90 percentile vote for Obama (King must be doing somersault in his grave) Maybe these voters, many of whom had never voted, and honestly were uninformed about politics, and particularly about Obama’s, jaded and quite honestly vile past which has caused deleterious effects to many people’s lives. What they thought perhaps was he’s someone like Martin Luther King, Jr., who dreamed of a future nation for his four children, void of race “. . . a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” Enter Obama , smooth, convincing, educated, and he plead a case for unity, not left or right but an all inclusive nation, he spoke a message of healing and truth. He “preached” about transparency in DC, and some, the uninformed in our nation, had hope beyond hope. Youth and minorities wanted a hip and “caring for the cause” president. But most of them now know the truth, and it is something far different. What they got in the first black US president (technically bi-racial) was not a dream, but a nightmare. His “amnesty” order will be hurting minorities the most and they’re already hurting the most. Painfully and deeply in the lack of job opportunities, murder, substance abuse, broken homes, fatherless children, poverty and other areas. The truth is Obama doesn’t care for anyone but Obama and his legacy. We’re here on the front lines with you Patriot Brothers and Sisters, and yes we’re waiting, waiting for our lawbreaking President to once again arrest the attention of legal U.S. tax paying citizens, along with those here illegally, those who are invading our country and burdening every aspect of our Federal and States systems. to again, break US Law. Obama’s own words make the best case against his lawless action. We are certainly praying for, and are hopeful that, Speaker Boehner & Senate Elect Majority Leader Mitch McConnell know that the American people have given them, and every member of the right side of the aisle another opportunity to show We The People that they can lead. Mitch McConnell and John Boehner would both do well in listening to intellectually honest, well spoken Patriots and colleague, Senators Mike Lee and Ted Cruz, who agree on what Ted Cruz wrote in the excerpt from Politico.
The Constitution designs a system of checks and balances for our nation, and executive amnesty for immigrants here illegally unilaterally decreed from the White House would seriously undermine the rule of law. Our founders repeatedly warned about the dangers of unlimited power within the executive branch; Congress should heed those words as the president threatens to grant amnesty to millions of people who have come to our country illegally. To be clear, the dispute over executive amnesty is not between President Obama and Republicans in Congress; it is a dispute between President Obama and the American people. The Democrats suffered historic losses in the midterm elections largely over the prospect of the president’s executive amnesty. President Obama was correct: His policies were on the ballot across the nation in 2014. The elections were a referendum on amnesty, and the voters soundly rejected it. There was no ambiguity. [read more]
— PushBackNow.com (@PushBackNow) November 20, 2014
The following is a must read for the POTUS
In Chapter 69, the president would be elected for a term of four years; he would be eligible for re-election. He would not have the life tenure of an hereditary monarch. The president would be liable to impeachment, trial, and removal from office upon being found guilty of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. He would be accountable at all times to the country at large.
The president was also to be the commander-in-chief of all regular United States military forces and of the state militias when called into national service. The president would have only occasional command of the state militias, and only when authorized by the Congress.
In addition, the president would have the power to pardon all offenders except those found guilty in an impeachment trial. He would regulate foreign relations with the advice and consent of the Senate, and have other extensive powers. But since a president was to be elected every four years, he could not possibly become a “perpetual and hereditary prince” like the despised and “tyrannical” King George III of Britain.
In Chapter 70, there were some who argued that a vigorous executive was inconsistent with republican principles. All men of sense agreed, said Hamilton, about the “necessity of an energetic executive.” That necessary energy would come from unity, duration, adequate provision for its support, and competent powers. The first need was “due dependence on the people”; the second, due responsibility.
As to unity, Hamilton argued (largely to himself), that executive powers should be concentrated in a single chief magistrate, and not in a council or anything of that sort. The history of Rome and the ancient Greek republics proved this, as well as the operations under various state governments. As chief magistrate, the president should bear sole responsibility for his acts. There was no need of a “council to the executive.”
In Chapter 71, this is a prolix essay on why the president’s term in office should be limited and why a new election to the presidency should be held periodically: every four years, as proposed. Four years would be long enough, but not too long. That period would keep the president responsive to the changing views and interests of the people if he hoped for re-election.
In Chapter 72, the president should be eligible for re-election. Otherwise, the chief magistrate might become irresponsible. Knowing that he would not be called to account by the people for whatever he did, he might do whatever he pleased, making himself a fortune while he could.
A man having served four years as president would have more knowledge of statecraft and the inner workings of the government than one who had not. To exclude a president from seeking to succeed himself might well result in the “fatal inconveniences of fluctuating councils and a variable policy.”
In Chapter 73, the vigor of the executive branch depended on adequate provision for its support, to be determined by Congress. It was possible that Congress might decide to “starve” an unpopular president by reducing or abolishing his salary, or “tempt him by largesses” to surrender his judgment and discretion.
No provision in the proposed constitution was more “judicious” than this, said Hamilton: The president would receive for his services a compensation “which shall neither be increased nor diminished, during the period for which he shall have been elected, . . . and shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States or any of them.” This would make the president financially independent and free to move as his judgment dictated.
The president should have the power to exercise a qualified negative over the acts of the two legislative bodies. He could return all bills he objected to so that they could not become laws unless subsequently passed again, this time by a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress. This would protect the president from having his powers whittled away by the legislature, and be a safeguard against hasty and ill-considered legislation. This would tend toward greater stability in government. To avoid a clash with the legislature, the president would be inclined to use his qualified veto cautiously.
In Chapter 74, among other requisite powers, the president was to be commander-in-chief of all regular United States military forces and of the state militias “when called into the actual service of the United States.” The propriety and reasons for this were so obvious, said Hamilton, that there was no need to discuss them.
The president was to have the power to grant pardons and reprieves for offences against the United States, “except in cases of impeachment.” There had been little criticism of this, Hamilton noted, except in relation to treason. Some argued that one or both legislative houses should be brought into proceedings involving the possible pardon of anyone convicted of treason. Hamilton saw some merit in that view, but concluded by saying that the power of granting pardons in treason cases should be left solely in the hands of the president, for “in seasons of insurrection or rebellion” the president could act more decisively and judiciously in granting amnesties. This might prevent the contending groups from coming to a violent and possibly disastrous collision.
Senate Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has a pay-back moment. Harry you have been sowing a lot of wind throughout the years, guess you are about to reap some whirlwinds. Reid is asked by CNN’s Dana Bash, would he move forward if the House passes a bill restoring NIH funding so several dozen kids with cancer can get treatment immediately? His answer is right in line with the Democrat death machine. “Why would we do that?” Harry Reid.
Time to be sure after this dust-up America, that no voting takes place except by legal US Citizens, and the demonstratively vile demagogic Democrat party is put in the minority in Congress and the Judiciary. -PBN
Not one, or some but ALL of Barack Barry Hussein “Taqiyya Man” Soetoro Obama’s promises have been broken…
The “most transparent administration in American history” has won another victory for secrecy.
How many of the enemy of Freedom Islamists are sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom?
A three-judge panel in U.S. Appeals Court ruled in favor of the Obama administration on Friday in an open-records case dealing with White House visitor logs. The court ruled that the logs, kept by the U.S. Secret Service, are not covered by the federal Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, overturning a U.S. district court ruling that said they were.
Government Officials have begun a disinformation campaign promoting only the 1st Amendment Rights of Muslims ignoring all other religions especially Jews & Christians. They are beginning in TN to try and brainwash Americans. Never forget what Obama said after the Benghazi attack. “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. This is more tagiyya from this administration and now is not the time to let your guard down. We must focus on what is true and just and right, and do it right now.
The attempted snow job by the American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) of Tennessee which sponsored the joint Department of Justice/FBI event, “Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society,”