America watched in disbelief as Barack Obama tried to tell the American people that the attack on the Libyan consulate on September 11 was the result of an amateurish, anti-Muslim video that had been on YouTube for three months with barely three hundred views.
Then suddenly the administration announced that it was, yes, a terrorist attack, but that it was the intelligence community that had fed him bad information, even though we knew our intelligence community had known it was an al-Qaeda-linked attack within twenty four hours.

Why the equivocation? Why the lies?

None of it made sense.

Until now.

Now Obama’s throwing long-time ally Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak under the bus for the Muslim Brotherhood makes sense. All the White House contacts with Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR and ISNA. All the changes that CAIR and ISNA made to the training manuals that our intelligence community uses.
Kevin Dujan, a political analyst and radio and TV host wrote an article and appeared on radio on October 8 putting forth a theory that the attack of the Libyan consulate was tied neither to a video or terrorism, but a botched kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens.

That Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released.

But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.

Their beloved Blind Sheik.


Western Journalism broke the news on Monday that a source connected to the White House has stated that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was a botched kidnapping linked to one Barack Hussein Obama.

What do you think of this post?
  • Offensive (0)
  • Funny (0)
  • Cool (0)
  • Obnoxious (0)
  • Scary (0)
  • Inspiring (0)
  • Crazy (0)
  • I see a theory, but no substantiation of the WH source in this opinion piece that was hardly decipherable. I absolutely believe B Hussein is directly involved in the cover up & the relationship w/guns being run to Syria & Turkey’s involvement.Early into this debacle I heard rumblings about a kidnapping attempt, but I would like to see the source mentioned in how, when, where in this opinion or somewhere

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • s

    added to my query is the fact that Hillary Clinton co-sponsered U.N. Bill 16/18, that would, if signed, implement Global Blasphamy Laws.. (Sharia) and do remember, prior to the attack, Middle East members at the U.N.had been calling for Blasphamy Laws prior to the attack. The next report was that the request had been dropped. Last week, the call for Global Blasphamy Law was re-requested.
    curious to say the least!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • s

    mmmm….. still doesn’t explain the pursuit of “blaming a utube video” that only 17 people saw up to the day of the attack. It doesn’t explain the resurection of the “Piss Christ” art for a showing in New York. The citizens weren’t buying what the administration was selling and there was no more mention of the “Piss Christ” art. The administration clung to it’s accusation casting blame on an obscure video and the dog and pony show of the actors who starred in the film and the arrest of the man who made the film, on trumped up charges. The most breath catching moment was Obama’s speech at the U.N. wherein he stated, “The future must not belong to those who would slander the Prophet”. This entire event exemplifies what the left is masterful at, “Create the Problem, Be the Solution” …
    and we are left with so many questions… while given no answers…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0