Want to see what a liar in Chief looks like? Take a look at obama’s web site ” Life Of Julia” a factitious woman who lives her whole life from cradle to grave on government dependence…
I’m going to put some comments from an article made by Tara Dodrill, she says it best…
The cradle-to–grave progression of the “Julia’s” life promises a near-utopian existence if America grants Obama a second term.
A recurring theme focused on the joys and benefits of government dependency is repugnant to fiscally conservative voters. In President Obama’s fantasy world, there is no mention of how all of “Julia’s” basic needs will be funded.
, “Julia” and the voters Obama’s ad are designed to entice have no desire to become personally responsible for their own lives. Imaginary women are the only ones that would be helped by more failed Obama policies. An existence in which food, housing, medical care, college and utilities are all free sounds very much like a Marxist fairytale.
As “Life of Julia” website visitors click through the years of her life, there is no mention of her holding an actual job until she is 27 years old. When “Julia” turns 31, she decides to have a child and gloriously reaps all the benefits of Obamacare. The page prominently notes the “free” screenings bestowed upon her by her ultra-liberal hero in the White House. Unless doctors agree to work without a paycheck in Obama’s utopia, the taxpayers are once again forced to fund the needs of others.
“Julia” and her eventual grandchildren would suffer tragically under Obama’s initiatives. When “Julia” enters her golden years, Obama promises a fully-funded Social Security program and a robust Medicare allotment, according to the website. At age 67 “Julia” can retire so comfortably she has time to volunteer at her community garden. Informed women who are truly concerned about retirement and medical care will vote for Mitt Romney. Under Obama’s supervision, both the Social Security and Medicare funds will be broke long before “Julia’s” hair turns gray.
Surely all liberals are not so naive or economically illiterate to actually believe President Obama’s free lunch mode of governance. Disproving the “Life of Julia” make-believe saga requires only the ability to understand simple math. Liberals are locked in a covert battle with women, creeping out from behind the bushes and snatching away their very sense of independence.
In Obama’s ideal world, men are replaced by bureaucrats.
In this Fictitious “War on Women” obama has conjured up, people need to look at the facts
women go to sleep wondering if they can pay the mortgage, if they can afford to put food on the table, and if their children will have a job after graduating from college. Nearly a million more women are out of work under President Obama while female poverty is at its highest level in nearly two decades. By all accounts, President Obama’s policies have failed women, like all Americans, and they deserve a president who will focus on getting America back on track.” amanda henneberg
In a column amusingly titled “Who the Hell Is ‘Julia’ and Why Am I Paying for Her Whole Life?” David Harsanyi raises an obvious objection to the story: “What we are left with is a celebration of a how a woman can live her entire life by leaning on government intervention, dependency and other people’s money rather than her own initiative or hard work. It is, I’d say, implicitly un-American, in the sense that it celebrates a mindset we have–outwardly, at least–shunned.”
Obama is setting forward a vision contrary to the American tradition of self-sufficiency–a welfare state that runs from cradle to grave. And it’s a dishonest vision, because it presents all of these benefits as “free,” never acknowledging that they are paid for through coercive taxation.
If people buy this lie, they are already living in a factitious world…angel