Boycott List – Fight For Your Freedom of Speech – Boycott Advertisers Bailing on Rush

22 comments on “Boycott List – Fight For Your Freedom of Speech – Boycott Advertisers Bailing on Rush”

1. I am looking for a list of all the sponsors that are pulling their advertising boycotting Rush’s show. Hear this!! I am boycotting you!! This is a perfect opportunity to find out who the liberal biased companies are, who I wouldn’t do business with in the first place had I known what they stood for. I and my friends WILL NEVER purchase product from you again!! I found out Toyota was one? Guess what I am changing my mind on this week!!! Order cancelled.

   Like or Dislike: 2  0

   Reply

   • way to go Rick, we stand with you!

     Like or Dislike: 3  0

     Reply

2. Is there a list of the sponsors who have stuck with Rush? I would like to SUPPORT those guys. – Mary

   Like or Dislike: 2  1

   Reply

3. P.S., Alec, you might want to find the website where you can be in agreement with all of those posting. This one isn’t it and from what I see you are being ignored. In other words…just go away!!

   Like or Dislike: 1  2

   Reply

4. Well here we are again…the “Left” trying to crucify Rush just like that have Gingrich, Lott, or anyone else that says something they don’t like or does something they don’t like.

   I tell ya, I’m sick and tired of this double standard. I’m so sick of it. I’m sick of the Republican’s mostly though because they bow down to the pressure and resign vs. fight. What, they think it will tarnish the party. Everyone knows that in Politics, nothing is off limits.

   From what I can see, this site isn’t going to get it done. I googled sites boycotting those advertisers pulling from Rush and this is what popped up. There aren’t enough people here! We need the Tea Party support. I will “DEFINITELY” boycott these advertisers pulling their ads. I’ll be upset about Netflix though as my children love it!

   Like or Dislike: 2  1

   Reply

5. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

   Thanks Kimba!

   We have found another poster who is incapable of responding to a single argument I articulated! I thought it was a little funny that in the original post(which has no been corrected) the author couldn’t make it through the first sentence without a spelling mistake. Feel free to explain why a comment on a news article should be held to the same review standard as the article it self.

   Your response is not racist. It is simply characteristic of an ideologue that can’t defend their position and can ONLY provide an ad hominem attack. I am pretty sure that is the same frustration Rush Limbaugh faced when he lied to his audience about the nature of Ms. Fluke’s testimony.

   Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 0  12

   Reply

   • Ms Fluke? The two bit bought and paid for left-wing prevaricating perjurer and liberal failure. LOL

     Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 14  1

     Reply

     • Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

       It “Hid my comment because of negative reviews”. Hence, my comment that rather than give me a “thumbs down” it would be impressive if you responded you reason, logic, or argumentation. Again, you have failed. Every time you post you prove that you have nothing of substance to say.

       Again, you failed to identify why you are claiming Sandra Fluke lied about. Since I am assuming you follow right wing blogs the current claim is that she lied about her age. Please show me any where she said she was twenty three. She did not in her testimony(which is posted below) or in any interviews. This was something the right wing started saying at the beginning to buttress their arguments that she was unqualified.

       Also, what does the right not understand about defamation? When you say someone is a perjurer, and they aren’t, that is defamation and you are tortiously liable.

       Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 2  8

       Reply

       • I got a great Idea Alec, we did our research, you do yours! Then you can come back and apologize for your inept disregard for truth and side in with the lying ineffective destroyers of life and our nation.

         Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 7  0

         Reply

6. Alec, Alec. Your spelling and punctuation are horrible, as well.

   Pot calling the kettle black!

   Oh wait…is that racist?

   Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 13  1

   Reply

7. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

   I will Repost because the site has now hidden my comment. Instead of giving me a “thumbs down” have some respect for yourselves and respond to my arguments. This is embarrassing!

   First, please do a basic spelling check before you write a post.

   Second, what are the above comments referencing in regard to “exposing Ms. Fluke”? Here is a link to her exact testimony(http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf). Ms. Fluke was entirely honest and did not discuss her own sex life at all. She simply discussed the fact that many women use hormonal replacement for reasons OTHER than contraception, such as preventing ovarian cancer. In fact, a class mate of hers lost an ovary and is now infertile because Georgetown refused to cover the hormonal birth control. The only person “exposed” was Rush Limbaugh. He completely lied about the nature of her testimony and showed a laughable ignorance of how birth control works(suggesting you take the pill every time you have sex). He also purposefully mischaracterized the way insurance works, suggesting Ms. Fluke wanted “tax payers to pay for her birth control”. In fact, Ms. Fluke wants the insurance she personally buys to cover birth control without her school prohibiting it.

   Third, you say the “These little fat rats are abandoning a ship of free speech”. You seem to lack any understanding of Free Speech. First, the First amendment guarantees you freedom of speech from the government, ensuring you won’t be jailed or forcibly censored for your speech. When the public demands corporations stop sponsoring and advertiser, and corporations agree, this is the essence of free speech. People have every right to express where they want their money to go. Furthermore, this is the mechanism that conservatives constantly say makes the free market work. Your stance is just inconsistent.

   Fourth, the spirit of this post is despicable and this is why the left characterizes certain members of the right so badly. You say, “freedom embracing lovers of America MUST focus and finish this fight by wholly destroying and utterly anhiliating while humiliating the left.” The “Left” is 30-40% of this country. I believe you truly sound sociopathic.

   Why can’t people who think Rush Limbaugh is ideologically right on policy issues agree that he acted viciously and reprehensibly?

   Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 1  7

   Reply

   • More lies. The site did NOT hide your comment, you just didn’t get any raves loser.

     Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 8  1

     Reply

8. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

   Dave Orts,

   How are you not embarrassed that in your entire post you didn’t even attempt to refute a single one of my arguments. You provided a paragraph of senseless buzz words and ad hominem attacks. Your post alone speaks to the weakness of your position.

   Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 1  5

   Reply

   • Remuniration for efforts expended not ROI. You are a liberal, therefore, you are a failure.

     Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 8  1

     Reply

     • Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

       Wow, your logic is amazing. I am shocked you aren’t polling a head of Santorum in Ohio. Clearly you care about this topic. Otherwise, why would you keep posting? Isn’t it embarrassing to be so interested in a topic yet lack to capability to argue about it substantively? That seems like a failure.

       Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 1  5

       Reply

       • A substantial argument requires a substantial opponent. You are lacking in intellectual prowess and honesty.

         Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 5  1

         Reply

9. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

   First, please do a basic spelling check before you write a post.

   Second, what are the above comments referencing in regard to “exposing Ms. Fluke”? Here is a link to her exact testimony(http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf). Ms. Fluke was entirely honest and did not discuss her own sex life at all. She simply discussed the fact that many women use hormonal replacement for reasons OTHER than contraception, such as preventing ovarian cancer. In fact, a class mate of hers lost an ovary and is now infertile because Georgetown refused to cover the hormonal birth control. The only person “exposed” was Rush Limbaugh. He completely lied about the nature of her testimony and showed a laughable ignorance of how birth control works(suggesting you take the pill every time you have sex). He also purposefully mischaracterized the way insurance works, suggesting Ms. Fluke wanted “tax payers to pay for her birth control”. In fact, Ms. Fluke wants the insurance she personally buys to cover birth control without her school prohibiting it.

   Third, you say the “These little fat rats are abandoning a ship of free speech”. You seem to lack any understanding of Free Speech. First, the First amendment guarantees you freedom of speech from the government, ensuring you won’t be jailed or forcibly censored for your speech. When the public demands corporations stop sponsoring and advertiser, and corporations agree, this is the essence of free speech. People have every right to express where they want their money to go. Furthermore, this is the mechanism that conservatives constantly say makes the free market work. Your stance is just inconsistent.

   Fourth, the spirit of this post is despicable and this is why the left characterizes certain members of the right so badly. You say, “freedom embracing lovers of America MUST focus and finish this fight by wholly destroying and utterly anhiliating while humiliating the left.” The “Left” is 30-40% of this country. I believe you truly sound sociopathic.

   Why can’t people who think Rush Limbaugh is ideologically right on policy issues agree that he acted viciously and reprehensibly?

   Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 2  8

   Reply

   • We can always count on the self-righteous kindergarten teacher types like you to tell us when we’re wrong and find every available opportunity to correct. Your wall of half-baked text is as repugnant and feckless as the spirit in which it was written. Fluke is another preposterous poser progressive, a liar and lousy setup. You’re going to get it soon enough. Keep coming back for more ownership Alec Failure.

     Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 6  1

     Reply

10. I think this is outrageous and it gets more sickening as time goes on. She has lied to the American public about who she is and what she is. I do think we need to push back, because its the left that tries to silence the right or anyone who doesn’t agree with their agenda. I’m finding it hard to not to call her a few choice words myself.

    Does anyone know if the mainstream media, or any left-to-center blogger has pointed out her deception?

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 31  2

    Reply

    • The double standard that the liberals have been trying to employ is deplorable. But, we will win because of heart, passion and far better ideas. She was going by Susan and Sandra the 23/30 year old. Your post is greatly appreciated Tsarina1!

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 9  2

      Reply

11. Fluke spoke, was exposed as a fraud. Rush saw through her, & called her out on her lies. And for that, these businesses are bailing? What Cowards!

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 39  2

    Reply

    • Debra (a powerful woman in the OT) you nailed it succinctly. This is one of tose situations however, where “Those who laugh last, laugh loudest” The left want a war, let’s FINALLY give it to them. Thanks for your post!

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 12  1

      Reply